Tiyas
Fauziah
2201411005
Rombel
4 / 103 – 104
8. Individual
Differences in L2 Acquisition
SLA
acknowledges that there are individual differences in L2 acquisition. We will
now examine a number of psychological dimensions of difference.
These
dimensions are many and various. Learners’ preferred ways of learning may
influence their overall orientation to the learning task and the kind of input
they find it easiest to work with. We will focus on two of the major dimensions-language
aptitude and motivation.
Language aptitude
People
differ in the extent to which they possess a natural ability for learning an
L2. This ability, known as language aptitude.
Early
work by John Carrol led to the identification of a anumber of components af
language aptitude. These are:
1. Phonemic
coding ability, i.e. the ability to identify the sounds of a foreign laguage so
that they can be remembered later.
2. Grammatical
sensitivity, i.e. the ability to recognize the grammatical functions of words
in sentences.
3. Inductive
language learning ability, i.e. the ability to identify patterns of
sorrespondence and relations between form and meaning.
4. Rote
learning ability, i.e. the ability to form ad remember associations between
stimuli.
Research involving
language aptitude has focused on whether and to what extent language aptitude
is related to success in L2 learning. Research has shown that this is so
whether the measure of L2 proficiency is some kind of formal language test or a
measure of more communicative language use. Most of the research on the
relationship between language aptitude and L2 proficiency took place in the
1950s and 1960s and, therefore, predates the birth of SLA.
Motivation
Various
kinds of motivation have been identified; instrumental, integrative,
resultative, and intrinsic.
· Instrumental
motivation
Learners may make
efforts to learn an L2 for some functional reason-to pass an examination, to
get a better job, or to get a place at university. In some learning contexts,
an instrumental motivation seems to be the major force determining success in
L2 learning.
· Integrative
motivation
Some learners may
choose to learn a particular L2 because they are interested in the people and
culture represented by the target-language group. However, in other learning contexts,
an integrative motivation does not seem to be so important.
· Resultative
motivation
An assumption of the
research referred to above is that motivation is the cause of L2 achievement.
It is also possible that motivation is the result of learning. That is,
learners who experience success in learning may become more, or in some
contexts, less motivated to learn.
· Intrinsic
motivation
In some learning situations, it may
not be learners’ general reasons for learning an L2 that are crucial in
determining their motivation. It is possible that many learners do not hold
distinct attitudes, positive or negative, towards the target-language group.
Learning strategies
Learning
strategies are the particular approaches or techniques that learners employ
to try to learn an L2. Different kinds of learning strategies have been
identified. Cognitive strategies are those that are involved in the analysis,
synthesis, or transformation of learning materials. Metacognitive strategies
are those involved in planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning.
There
have been various attempts to discover which strategies are important for L2
acquisition. One way is to investigate how ‘goos language learners’ try to
learn. Other studies have sought to relate learners’ reported use of different
strategies to their L2 proficiency to try to find out which strategies are
important for language development.
The
study of learning strategies is of potential value to language teachers. If
those learning strategies that are crucial for learning can be identified, it
may prove possible to train students to use them.
Questions :
1. Do
the learners must have foue kinds of motivation in learning SLA? Why?
2. What
are the examples of learning strategies?
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar